Prone positioning for mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019: the experience of an Irish regional hospital intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have been known for many years. While some controversy exists regarding whether coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia should be treated with the same therapeutic strategies as for non-COVID ARDS, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign still provide a weak recommendation to utilise prone positioning in this setting. AIMS: The aims of this study are to ascertain if prone positioning improves oxygenation significantly in mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS and to describe the feasibility of frequent prone positioning in an Irish regional hospital intensive care unit (ICU) with limited prior experience. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we investigate if the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and ventilatory ratio improve during and following prone positioning, and whether this improvement correlates with patient baseline characteristics or survival. RESULTS: Between March 2020 and 2021, 12 patients underwent prone positioning while mechanically ventilated for severe COVID ARDS. Sixty-six percent were male, mean age 60.9 (± 10.5), mean BMI 33.5 (± 6.74) and median APACHE II score on admission to ICU was 10.5 (7.25-16.3). Further, 83% were proned within 24 h of being intubated due to refractory hypoxaemia. PaO2/FiO2 ratio improved from 11.6 kPa (9.80-13.8) to 15.80 kPa (13.1-19.6) while prone, p < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: We found prone positioning to be a safe method of significantly improving oxygenation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS. We did not find a relationship between patient baseline characteristics nor illness severity and degree of PaO2/FiO2 ratio improvement, nor did we find a relationship between degree of PaO2/FiO2 ratio improvement and survival.

Erratum: Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1120837.].

Respiratory Therapy and Proning

The novel SARS coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for COVID-19 which primarily affects the respiratory tract, particularly the lungs, of infected patients. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a large number of hospitalized patients with respiratory failure reaching the level of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS requires prolonged respiratory care. Critically ill patients can frequently progress to decompensation and death. Respiratory therapy is therefore important in response to such a health crisis as COVID-19, to improve patient care and ultimately prevent mortality. Modern respiratory care science has shown that proning can improve oxygenation of patients with ARDS. Planning and preparation for a viral respiratory health crisis require a strategy and system to prone patients effectively and safely. In this two-part chapter, perspectives are presented on respiratory therapy and proning during the pandemic. The experience of respiratory therapy at the SBH Health System during the COVID-19 crisis surge in Spring 2020 presents rich lessons to be learned about health crisis planning, preparation, and management with respect to respiratory therapy. © SBH Health System 2022.

Experiences of maintaining awake prone positioning in non-intubated patients with COVID-19: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Patient compliance is crucial to maintaining the awake prone position, which has been found to be intolerable by several patients. Addressing patients' compliance while being treated with awake prone positioning and prolonging its duration may be prerequisites for further research. AIMS: This study was conducted to explore the personal experiences of non-intubated patients during the implementation of awake prone positioning. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a qualitative study recruiting a purposive sample of twelve adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who were previously treated with awake prone positioning. They were recruited from an intermediate care unit (that provides pre- and post-intensive care) in a COVID-19-designated hospital in Nanjing, China from July 15, 2021, to September 20, 2021. Data were collected through individual in-depth interviews and then analysed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method. RESULTS: Content analysis of the interviews revealed two main themes, each containing three and four sub-themes, respectively, as follows: (1) barriers to the implementation of awake prone positioning, including (i) generalised discomfort, (ii) a lack of both understanding and trust, and (iii) low satisfaction with the implementation plan; (2) factors promoting the implementation of awake prone positioning, including (i) health education and supervision, (ii) self-motivation and support from healthcare staff and family members, (iii) finding a comfortable position and having access to entertainment, and (iv) symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare staff should clarify the mechanism underlying the effectiveness of the awake prone position to patients to eliminate any doubts that they may have. Psychological support and appropriate supervision should be emphasised. Pain relief programmes should also be established, including the use of a comfortable prone posture in conjunction with access to entertainment. Finally, individualised awake prone positioning protocols should be formulated according to patients' living habits and attempted in combination with out-of-bed activities. These measures may help to enhance the experience and compliance of patients undergoing the treatment. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: For future instances involving the implementation of awake prone positioning, several measures should be established and implemented alongside it, including a health education programme, supervision programme, support system, and pain relief programme. Personalisation should also be considered during its implementation. These measures may help to enhance the compliance of patients and prolong the duration of the awake prone position.

Upper Extremity Neuropathies Following Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Multicenter Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to examine presentation, injury patterns, and clinical course, for COVID-19-related peripheral nerve injury following mechanical ventilation. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that required mechanical ventilation was undertaken. Patient records were reviewed for intensive care unit and intubation characteristics, prone or lateral decubitus positioning, and the onset of neuropathy diagnosis. RESULTS: Between September 2020 and January 2022, 11 patients were diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy, including 9 with brachial plexopathy following COVID-19 infection. Each patient developed ARDS requiring mechanical ventilation for a median of 39 days. Six patients (54.5%) underwent prone positioning and 1 lateral decubitus. Neuropathies involved 5 brachial pan-plexopathies, 2 incomplete brachial plexopathies, 2 lower trunk plexopathies, 1 radial neuropathy, and 1 bilateral ulnar neuropathy. At a mean follow-up of 10.2 months, patients with brachial pan-plexopathies demonstrated signs of reinnervation proximally, and 1 resolved to a radial mononeuropathy; however, the majority have demonstrated minimal clinical improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Our series demonstrates that peripheral neuropathies and especially brachial plexopathies have occurred following mechanical ventilation for ARDS-related COVID-19 infections. Contrary to prior COVID-19 studies, only 54.5% of these patients underwent prone positioning. Aside from a traumatic disturbance of prone positioning, the increased incidence of neuropathy may involve an atraumatic effect of COVID-19 via direct invasion of nerves, autoantibody targeting of nervous tissue, or hypercoagulation-induced microthrombotic angiopathy.

The role of prone positioning in patients with SARS-CoV-2-related respiratory failure in non-intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Prone positioning (PP) is an established and commonly used lung recruitment method for intubated patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, with potential benefits in clinical outcome. The role of PP outside the intensive care unit (ICU) setting is debated. OBJECTIVES: We aimed at assessing the role of PP in death and ICU admission in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure related to COronaVIrus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pneumonia. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of a collaborative multicenter database obtained by merging local non-interventional cohorts. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with COVID-19-related respiratory failure were included in a collaborative cohort and classified based on the severity of respiratory failure according to the partial arterial oxygen pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2) and on clinical severity by the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score. The primary study outcome was the composite of in-hospital death or ICU admission within 30 days from hospitalization. RESULTS: PP was used in 114 of 536 study patients (21.8%), more commonly in patients with lower PaO2/FiO2 or receiving non-invasive ventilation and less commonly in patients with known comorbidities. A primary study outcome event occurred in 163 patients (30.4%) and in-hospital death in 129 (24.1%). PP was not associated with death or ICU admission (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.78-1.74) and not with death (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.61-1.67) at multivariable analysis; PP was an independent predictor of ICU admission (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.53-4.40). The lack of association between PP and death or ICU admission was confirmed at propensity score-matching analysis. CONCLUSION: PP is used in a non-negligible proportion of non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related severe respiratory failure and is not associated with death but with ICU admission. The role of PP in this setting merits further evaluation in randomized studies.

PaO2 / FiO2 ratio responsiveness to prone positioning in intubated patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective observational study.

Aim: Prone positioning of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients could improve oxygenation. However, clinical data on prone positioning of intubated COVID-19 patients are limited. We investigated trends of PaO2 / FiO2 ratio values in patients during prone positioning to identify a predictive factor for early detection of patients requiring advanced therapeutic intervention such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study was undertaken between April 2020 and May 2021 in a tertiary referral hospital for COVID-19 in Osaka, Japan. We included intubated adult COVID-19 patients treated with prone positioning within the first 72 h of admission to the intensive care unit and followed them until hospital discharge or death. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and escalation of care to ECMO. We used unsupervised k-means clustering modeling to categorize COVID-19 patients by PaO2 / FiO2 ratio responsiveness to prone positioning. Results: The final study cohort comprised 54 of 155 consecutive severe COVID-19 patients. Three clusters were generated according to trends in PaO2 / FiO2 ratios during prone positioning (cluster A, n = 16; cluster B, n = 24; cluster C, n = 14). Baseline characteristics of all clusters were almost similar. Cluster A (no increase in PaO2 / FiO2 ratio during prone positioning) had a significantly higher proportion of patients placed on ECMO or who died (6/16, 37.5%). Numbers of patients with ECMO and with in-hospital death were significantly different between the three groups (p = 0.017). Conclusion: In Japanese patients intubated due to COVID-19, clinicians should consider earlier escalation of treatment, such as facility transfer or ECMO, if the PaO2 / FiO2 ratio does not increase during initial prone positioning.

Awake Prone Positioning in Non-Intubated Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been advocated to improve oxygenation and prevent intubation of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This paper aims to synthesize the available evidence on the efficacy of APP. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of proportional outcomes from observational studies to compare intubation rate in patients treated with APP or with standard care. RESULTS: A total of 46 published and 4 unpublished observational studies that included 2,994 subjects were included, of which 921 were managed with APP and 870 were managed with usual care. APP was associated with significant improvement of oxygenation parameters in 381 cases of 19 studies that reported this outcome. Among the 41 studies assessing intubation rates (870 subjects treated with APP and 852 subjects treated with usual care), the intubation rate was 27% (95% CI 19-37%) as compared to 30% (95% CI 20-42%) (P = .71), even when duration of application, use of adjunctive respiratory assist device (high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive ventilation), and severity of oxygenation deficit were taken into account. There appeared to be a trend toward improved mortality when APP was compared with usual care (11% vs 22%), which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: APP was associated with improvement of oxygenation but did not reduce the intubation rate in subjects with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19. This finding is limited by the high heterogeneity and the observational nature of included studies. Randomized controlled clinical studies are needed to definitively assess whether APP could improve key outcome such as intubation rate and mortality in these patients.

Response to Awake Prone Position in Nonintubated Individuals With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Prone positioning is used for patients with ARDS undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation; its effectiveness in nonventilated awake patients is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the prone maneuver in decreasing the risk of intubation and increasing the odds of favorable events. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 66 subjects with COVID-19-related moderate ARDS who were admitted to the ICU; treated with high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, a reservoir mask, or a nasal cannula; and subjected to awake prone maneuvers from March 1, 2020-August 30, 2020. The following factors were recorded at ICU admission: age, sex, prior illness, simplified acute physiology score 3, body mass index, and changes in gas exchange after and before prone positioning. Subjects were divided into a group of responders and nonresponders according to a 20% increase in the PaO2 /FIO2 ratio before and after the maneuver. The need for intubation within 48 h of the start of the maneuver was also evaluated. We also analyzed the differences in mortality, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. A generalized estimating equation model was applied to preprone and postprone means. To control for confounding factors, multivariate Poisson regression was applied. RESULTS: Forty-one subjects age 54.1 y ± 12.9 were enrolled. Responders showed increased SpO2 (P < .001), PaO2 (P < .001), and PaO2 /FIO2 ratios (P < .001) with the maneuver and reduced breathing frequency. Responders had shorter lengths of stay in the ICU (P < .001) and hospital (P < .003), lower intubation rates at 48 h (P < .012), fewer days of ventilation (P < .02), and lower mortality (P < .001). Subjects who responded to the maneuver had a 54% reduction in the risk of ventilation and prolonged stay in the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Among the responders to prone positioning, there were fewer deaths, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, shorter ICU length of stay, and shorter hospital length of stay.

Association of lung recruitment and change in recruitment-to-inflation ratio from supine to prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Prone positioning is an evidence-based treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lung recruitment has been proposed as one of the mechanisms by which prone positioning reduces mortality in this group of patients. Recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I) is a method to measure potential for lung recruitment induced by a change in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the ventilator. The association between R/I and potential for lung recruitment in supine and prone position has not been studied with computed tomography (CT) scan imaging. In this secondary analysis, we sought to investigate the correlation between R/I measured in supine and prone position with CT and the potential for lung recruitment as measured by CT scan. Among 23 patients, the median R/I did not significantly change from supine (1.9 IQR 1.6-2.6) to prone position (1.7 IQR 1.3-2.8) (paired t test p = 0.051) but the individual changes correlated with the different response to PEEP. In supine and in prone position, R/I significantly correlated with the proportion of lung tissue recruitment induced by the change of PEEP. Lung tissue recruitment induced by a change of PEEP from 5 to 15 cmH2O was 16% (IQR 11-24%) in supine and 14.3% (IQR 8.4-22.6%) in prone position, as measured by CT scan analysis (paired t test p = 0.56). In this analysis, PEEP-induced recruitability as measured by R/I correlated with PEEP-induced lung recruitment as measured by CT scan, and could help to readjust PEEP in prone position.

Efficacy and safety of awake prone positioning in the treatment of non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, prone positioning has been widely applied for non-intubated, spontaneously breathing patients. However, the efficacy and safety of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure remain unclear. We aimed to systematically analyze the outcomes associated with awake prone positioning (APP). Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from January 1, 2020, to June 3, 2022. This study included adult patients with acute respiratory failure caused by COVID-19. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome was the reported cumulative intubation risk across randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the effect estimates were calculated as risk ratios (RRs; 95% confidence interval [CI]). Results: A total of 495 studies were identified, of which 10 fulfilled the selection criteria, and 2294 patients were included. In comparison to supine positioning, APP significantly reduced the need for intubation in the overall population (RR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.95). The two groups showed no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events (RR=1.16, 95% CI: 0.48-2.76). The meta-analysis revealed no difference in mortality between the groups (RR=0.93, 95% CI: 0.77-1.11). Conclusions: APP was safe and reduced the need for intubation in patients with respiratory failure associated with COVID-19. However, it did not significantly reduce mortality in comparison to usual care without prone positioning.

Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Previous studies have shown that an awake prone position may be beneficial for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) in patients with COVID-19, but the results are not consistent, especially in terms of oxygenation outcomes and intubation rate. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of the awake prone position on AHRF in patients with COVID-19 with all randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: An extensive search of online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 December 2019 to 30 October 2022, with no language restrictions was performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis are based on the PRISMA statement. We only included RCTs and used the Cochrane risk assessment tool for quality assessment. Results: Fourteen RCTs fulfilled the selection criteria, and 3,290 patients were included. A meta-analysis found that patients in the awake prone position group had more significant improvement in the SpO2/FiO2 ratio [mean difference (MD): 29.76; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.39-48.13; P = 0.001] compared with the usual care. The prone position also reduced the need for intubation [odd ratio (OR): 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.84; P < 0.0001; I 2 = 0%]. There was no significant difference in mortality, hospital length of stay, incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and adverse events between the two groups. Conclusion: The awake prone position was a promising intervention method, which is beneficial to improve the oxygenation of patients with ARDS or AHRF caused by COVID-19 and reduce the need for intubation. However, the awake prone position showed no obvious advantage in mortality, hospital length of stay, incidence of ICU admission, and adverse events. Systematic review registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identifier: CRD42022367885.

Effects of Awake Prone Positioning in Non-intubated Spontaneously Breathing COVID-19 Patients Requiring High Flow Oxygen Therapy in High Dependency Unit (HDU): An Observational Study.

Background and Aims: Prone positioning increases oxygenation by recruiting dorsal lung regions and draining airway secretions and improves gas exchange and survival in ARDS. We describe the efficacy of prone positioning in awake non-intubated spontaneously breathing COVID-19 positive patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure. Methods: We studied 26 awake non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure treated with prone positioning. Patients were kept in prone position for two hours in each session and four such sessions were given to patients in 24 hours. SPO2, PaO, 2RR and haemodynamics were measured before prone positioning (PRE), 60 minutes of prone positioning (PRONE), and one hour after the completion of each session (POST). Results: 26 patients (12 males and 14 females) non-intubated spontaneously breathing with SPO2 <94% on 0.4 FiO2 were treated with prone positioning. One patient required intubation and was shifted to ICU, the rest (25 patients) were discharged from HDU. Mean hours of prone positioning were 19.4 ± 2.06 hr. There was significant improvement in oxygenation (increase in PaO2 from 53.15 ± 6.0 mmHg to 64.23 ± 6.96 mmHg in PRE and POST sessions respectively, likewise there was increase in SPO2). No complications were noted with various sessions. Conclusion: Prone positioning was feasible and improved oxygenation in awake non-intubated, spontaneously breathing COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure.

Penile pressure ulcers secondary to indwelling catheter and prone positioning for COVID-19 infection.

Prone ventilation is an effective and increasingly utilised tool in the management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), a common sequela of COVID-19 infection. However, its use is associated with a significant risk of pressure ulcers. We report a unique case of prone positioning, catheter-related penile pressure ulcer. Clinical awareness, early recognition and regular repositioning is crucial in the prevention of this complication.

Effect Of Eight Hours Per Day Of Intermittent Self Prone Positioning For Seven Days On The Severity Of Covid-19 Pneumonia/ Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Prone positioning improves ventilation-perfusion mismatch, distribution of gravitational gradient in pleural pressure, and oxygen saturation significantly in patients with Covid pneumonia. We aimed to find out the efficacy of eight hours per day of intermittent selfprone positioning for seven days in patients affected with COVID-19 pneumonia/ ARDS. METHODS: This Randomized Clinical Trial was conducted in the Covid isolation wards of Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad. Patients suffering from COVID-19 pneumonia/ ARDS were enrolled with permuted block randomization into a control and an experimental group each consisting of 36 patients. Parameters of Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) score along with other sociodemographic data was noted on a preformed structured questionnaire. Death was confirmed by requesting the death certificate of patients on the 90th day of enrolment. Data Analysis was done with SPSS Version 25. Tests of significance were applied to calculate the difference in the patients of the two groups with respect to respiratory physiology and survival. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 63.79±15.26 years. A total of 25 (32.9%) male and 47 (61.8%) female patients were enrolled. Statistically significant improvement was found in the respiratory physiology of the patients at 7th and 14th DOA between the groups. Pearson Chi-Square test of significance showed a difference in mortality between the two groups at 14th DOA (pvalue=0.011) but not at 90th DOA (p-value=0.478). Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) test of significance, applied on the Kaplan Meier curve and showed no statistically significant difference among the groups based on the survival of the patients. (p-value=0.349). CONCLUSIONS: Early transient improvement in respiratory physiology and mortality does occur with 8 hours of self-prone positioning for seven days but there is no effect on the 90-day survival of the patients. Thus, the impact of the manoeuvre on improving survival needs to be explored with studies having an application of the manoeuvre for a longer duration and period.

The PhLIP team: Feasibility of a physiotherapy-led intensive prone positioning team initiative during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in a surge of patients with refractory hypoxaemic respiratory failure being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Prone positioning can improve oxygenation but requires a team of skilled personnel to complete safely. Critical care physiotherapists (PTs) are ideally suited to lead proning teams, due to their expertise in moving critically unwell, invasively ventilated patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the feasibility of implementing a physiotherapy-led intensive proning (PhLIP) team to support the critical care team during surges. METHODS: This study involves descriptive evaluation of feasibility and implementation of the PhLIP team, a novel model of care, during the Delta wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, through a retrospective, observational audit of PhLIP team activity, ICU clinical activity, and a description of clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Between 17 September and 19 November 2021, 93 patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the ICU. Fifty-one patients (55%) were positioned prone, a median [interquartile range] 2 [2, 5] times, for a mean (±standard deviation) duration of 16 (±2) h, across 161 episodes. Twenty-three PTs were upskilled and deployed to the PhLIP team, adding 2.0 equivalent full time to the daily service. Ninety-four percent of prone episodes (154) were led by the PhLIP PTs with a median 4 [interquartile range: 2, 8] turns per day. Potential airway adverse events occurred on three occasions (1.8%) and included an endotracheal tube leak, displacement, and obstruction. Each incident was promptly managed without prolonged impact on the patient. No manual handling injuries were reported. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a physiotherapy-led proning team was safe and feasible and can release critical care-trained medical and nursing staff to other duties in the ICU.

Catheterization Without Supination-A Series of 36 Prone Position Internal Jugular Vein Cannulations.

Describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 32 critically ill patients who underwent central venous cannulation of the internal jugular vein while in prone position. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Single tertiary-care urban academic safety-net hospital. PATIENTS/SUBJECTS: Patients requiring mechanical ventilation and prone positioning for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome from March 1, 2020, through March 31, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Internal jugular vein cannulation while in the prone position. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The technique used for venous access, procedural complications, patient demographics, and clinical outcomes are described. Thirty-six prone internal jugular vein cannulations for 32 hemodialysis catheters and four central venous catheters were successfully performed in 32 patients. One immediate and one delayed pneumothorax occurred. Inhospital mortality was 88%. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest series to date, cannulation of the internal jugular vein with the patient in prone position is feasible but associated with a 6% risk of pneumothorax. Severity of illness in patients intolerant of supine positioning results in high inhospital mortality.

Strategies to achieve adherence to prone positioning in awake COVID-19 patients with high-flow nasal oxygen. A case series.

Introduction: The use of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is a simple method that can reduce intubation in patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF). Early and prolonged prone position has demonstrated benefits on mortality in mechanically ventilated patients and on intubation in awake patients with ARF. However, strategies to achieve adherence to awake prone positioning (APP) have not been previously described. Case and outcomes: We present six patients with ARF due to COVID-19 treated with HFNO and APP. The median (p25-75) of PaFiO2 upon admission was 121 (112-175). The average duration of APP on the first day was 16 h (SD 5 h). Duration (median p25-75) in APP for the following 20 days was 13 (10-18) h/day. Several strategies such as the presence of a health care team, recreational activities, adaptation of the circadian rhythm, oral nutritional support, and analgesics were used to improve prone tolerance. None of the patients suffered from delirium, all were ambulating on discharge from the ICU and none require intubation. Conclusion: The case series presented show the feasibility of prolonged use of HFNO and APP in patients with COVID-19 and severe persistent hypoxemia and described strategies to enhance adherence.

Awake Prone Positioning for Non-Intubated COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been widely applied in non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. However, the results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are inconsistent. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of APP and to identify the subpopulations that may benefit the most from it. METHODS: We searched five electronic databases from inception to August 2022 (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022342426). We included only RCTs comparing APP with supine positioning or standard of care with no prone positioning. Our primary outcomes were the risk of intubation and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included the need for escalating respiratory support, length of ICU and hospital stay, ventilation-free days, and adverse events. RESULTS: We included 11 RCTs and showed that APP reduced the risk of requiring intubation in the overall population (RR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.95; moderate certainty). Following the subgroup analyses, a greater benefit was observed in two patient cohorts: those receiving a higher level of respiratory support (compared with those receiving conventional oxygen therapy) and those in intensive care unit (ICU) settings (compared to patients in non-ICU settings). APP did not decrease the risk of mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.77-1.11; moderate certainty) and did not increase the risk of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, APP likely reduced the risk of requiring intubation, but failed to demonstrate a reduction in overall mortality risk. The benefits of APP are most noticeable in those requiring a higher level of respiratory support in an ICU environment.